EEA Regulations: retained rights v derivative rights.
The current EEA
Regulations have a provision for both of the above but what is the difference? The
EEA law in general can be a minefield, with the ever-changing Regulations in
the way of various Amendments rather than all rules in one documents. Here we
explain retained right versus derivative rights.
RETAINED RIGHT OF
RESIDENCE: In some cases a family
member of an EEA citizen can retain a right of residency in the UK. The most
common example is a non-EEA spouse who can remain in the UK following the
divorce. There are requirements to meet, such as having been married for 3
years and actually being divorced on the date of application (plus more rules,
this is just an example). Unmarried partners can’t retain the right, though,
only spouses and civil partners, ie ‘married partners’.
The main difference is
this: those who retain a right of residence can eventually apply for a permanent
residency status. Those who have a derivate right – can’t.
DERIVATIVE RIGHT OF
RESIDENCE: For example, it covers a primary carer of an
EEA or British citizen, which is based on Rui Zambrano case. So, requiring a
carer to leave the UK (such as if he/she does not have a UK visa) would force
an EEA national to leave the European Union. This provision allows a non-EEA
citizen carer to remain in the UK to look after the EEA national in question to reside in the UK. An EEA national is often
a child but can be an adult requiring looking after as well. The downside is
this does not lead to permanent residency.
This right is “derived” from Article 20 of the Treaty
on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and not from Directive
2004/38/EC (the free movement Directive), on which the EEA Regulations are
based.
For an individual advice or to
make an application please contact us: info@1st4immigration.com
or visit www.1st4immigration.com
If you are an Immigration Adviser
or a Solicitor please visit our immigration Training and CPD website: www.1st4immigration.com/training